Provides for an additional fine for certain persons who commit the crime of identity theft
Impact
By instituting an additional fine, HB 744 seeks to provide stronger legal recourse against identity theft within sensitive sectors. Given the nature of the entities involved, this bill is expected to not only serve as a deterrent but also strengthen the penalties for breaches of trust that may lead to identity theft. As a result, those working in these roles may experience heightened scrutiny and increased legal consequences for violations, aiming for a more secure environment for vulnerable populations such as students and patients. It is anticipated that such measures could lead to a broader conversation about protections for private information across other sectors as well.
Summary
House Bill 744 proposes a modification to existing laws concerning identity theft by imposing an additional fine of $1,000 on individuals found guilty of this crime. This additional penalty applies particularly when the identity theft is facilitated through the offender's employment with or services provided to certain designated entities, including educational institutions, daycare centers, healthcare facilities, religious organizations, and correctional facilities. This legislation aims to enhance deterrents against identity theft, specifically targeting those in positions of trust where personal data is often vulnerable to misuse.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around HB 744 appears supportive, particularly among legislators who are concerned with safeguarding the identity and personal information of individuals, especially in institutions that serve children and vulnerable adults. The unanimous vote (92-0) in favor of the bill during its final passage indicates a strong consensus among lawmakers regarding the importance of addressing identity theft more rigorously. However, there may also be discussions regarding the specifics of enforcement and whether the additional fine adequately addresses the root causes of identity theft.
Contention
While there seems to be broad support for HB 744, potential points of contention could arise around issues of enforcement and compliance within the specified entities. Experts may debate the effectiveness of imposing additional fines versus enhancing educational programs or preventative measures for employees within the specified institutions. Critics could argue that simply imposing fines might not effectively deter identity theft without comprehensive systemic reforms to protect sensitive data at its source.
Adds a person's telephone number when used for "caller ID spoofing" to the definition of "personal identifying information" for purposes of the crime of identity theft. (8/1/18)
Provides relative to prohibitions on employment by certain health care providers of licensed ambulance personnel and nonlicensed persons who are convicted of certain criminal offenses