Louisiana House Bill HB909

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Requires local governing authorities to report the number of traffic citations issued and revenue collected directly to the legislature (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 909 directly affects state laws regarding traffic regulations and local governance. By mandating local authorities to submit this statistical data, the bill equips state lawmakers with comprehensive insights into traffic citation patterns and financial implications of traffic fines. This could lead to further legislative actions addressing traffic enforcement, potentially altering how local jurisdictions set policies related to speeding and fines.

Summary

House Bill 909 requires local governing authorities to report specific data regarding traffic citations, particularly speeding violations, directly to the legislature. This includes the number of individuals stopped for speeding, the total issued citations, and the revenue generated from fines tied to these violations. The objective of this bill is to provide the legislature with clear statistics that may inform legislation and oversight related to traffic enforcement across various municipalities in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 909 seems to be cautiously supportive, as it aims to increase transparency and accountability within local governing bodies. Proponents may argue that such reporting will enhance legislative control and allow for better-informed decisions concerning traffic safety and funding. Meanwhile, there may be concerns from local authorities about the administrative burden and the necessity of such a reporting requirement, fearing it could lead to overreach from the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 909 involve the implications of increased state oversight on local governing authorities. Critics may argue that mandating reporting could infringe on local autonomy, imposing additional administrative tasks without providing corresponding resources. Debates may arise regarding the usefulness of such data, questioning whether it translates to better traffic safety outcomes or if it merely serves as another regulatory measure that could complicate local governance.