Relative to TOPS, specifies circumstances under which an award applicant's ACT/SAT test score can be submitted to and considered by the program's administering agency after statutorily established submission deadlines (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The enactment of HB926 would impact existing laws governing the administration of financial assistance programs in Louisiana. By permitting consideration of test scores submitted after deadlines, the bill seeks to potentially increase the number of students who can qualify for TOPS, addressing concerns of equity and fairness in access to educational opportunities. This shift could lead to a more inclusive approach to financial assistance for students across the state.
Summary
House Bill 926 aims to amend the guidelines and procedures for the Louisiana Student Financial Assistance Commission regarding the consideration of certain test scores, specifically the ACT and SAT. This bill allows applicants for the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) to submit qualifying scores obtained after the statutory deadlines, under specific circumstances. This is intended to provide greater flexibility and accessibility for students who may have faced unique challenges in meeting the deadlines due to factors beyond their control.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around HB926 appears positive, as it is seen as a step towards ensuring that deserving students are not penalized for circumstances that hinder their ability to submit their test scores on time. Supporters of the bill, which includes various educational advocates, argue that it reflects a commitment to educational access and equity, particularly for students who may face adversity. However, there may be some concerns regarding the potential for an increase in administrative burdens on the financial assistance commission due to the need to evaluate late submissions.
Contention
Despite its positive reception, the bill has generated some points of contention. Critics may raise concerns about the integrity of standardized testing timelines and the potential implications for fairness among applicants who submitted their scores on time versus those benefiting from the new provisions. There may also be discussions surrounding how effectively the commission can manage and implement these new guidelines without compromising the overall efficiency of the TOPS program.
Revises core curriculum requirements and the method of calculating the grade point average for TOPS awards. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Extends TOPS eligibility for certain students who reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces and maintain continuous active duty (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Changes certain TOPS initial eligibility requirements and provides relative to the sharing of certain student data. (gov sig) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)