Louisiana House Bill HB999

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/20/12
• Refer: 3/21/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Joey E. Walker v. State of La. DOTD"

Impact

The passage of HB 999 will directly affect state financial management practices, particularly how the state appropriates funds to settle legal judgments. By appropriating these funds, Louisiana demonstrates its intention to honor legal commitments and manage taxpayer expectations regarding state expenditures. Additionally, this bill emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with court rulings, which may influence future legislations regarding budgetary allocations for legal settlements.

Summary

House Bill 999 appropriates funds from the state of Louisiana's General Fund for the fiscal year 2012-2013 to pay a consent judgment related to the case 'Joey E. Walker v. State of La. DOTD'. This bill seeks to ensure that the state meets its financial obligations stemming from a legal settlement, reflecting a commitment to uphold the law and manage the consequences of its actions. The total amount allocated for this payment is $50,000, which is deemed necessary to resolve the legal dispute amicably and avoid further litigation costs.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 999 appears to be generally pragmatic, as it deals with necessary state financial obligations rather than contentious issues like policy changes or controversial initiatives. Legislators seem to view the payment of legal judgments as a fundamental duty of the state, thus there is likely broad support for ensuring that obligations are met, regardless of party lines. However, discussions could reflect concerns about the source of the funds and the implications for the state’s budget.

Contention

While there do not appear to be significant points of contention specifically noted in the discussions surrounding HB 999, it may raise broader questions about fiscal responsibility and the management of legal liabilities by the state. Appropriating funds for judgments could lead to debates on whether this reflects an adequate system for handling similar cases in the future, and advocates may call for policies that prevent excessive legal liabilities from accruing against the state.