Louisiana House Bill HCR201

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/3/12
• Engrossed: 6/4/12
• Passed: 6/4/12

Caption

Requests that the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education review its policies relative to graduation requirements, particularly as they pertain to core curricula and diploma paths

Impact

The resolution calls for a comprehensive review of the existing graduation requirements, which currently include two diploma paths: the college and career diploma path and the career diploma path. By requesting this review, HCR201 aims to ensure that the educational system aligns with the constitutional goal of providing equitable opportunities for all students. The expected impact is a potential reformation of policies that dictate how Louisiana prepares its students for future endeavors, specifically concerning their ability to choose curricula that best suit their needs and interests.

Summary

HCR201 is a concurrent resolution that urges the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to review its policies regarding graduation requirements in Louisiana high schools. This resolution specifically pertains to the evaluation of core curricula and diploma paths, which are crucial for student transition from high school to higher education or the workforce. The bill emphasizes the importance of providing students with flexible options in their educational pathways to better prepare them for postsecondary success.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR201 appears to be largely supportive, as the resolution focuses on enhancing educational opportunities for students. Legislators who backed the bill emphasized the necessity for greater flexibility in educational choices, reflecting a progressive approach to education reform. However, there may be underlying concerns about how these policy reviews will be implemented and what changes may arise from the recommendations made by the State Board.

Contention

While the resolution fosters a positive approach towards improving educational policies, some points of contention may arise during the review process. Discussions surrounding whether students should have the option to choose between diploma paths earlier in their high school careers could lead to debates on the best approach to educational outcomes. There are differing opinions on balancing rigorous academic preparation against the need for exploration and discovery of student interests, which may affect future legislative actions and educational strategies.