Louisiana House Bill HR171

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/30/17
• Refer: 5/30/17

Caption

Requests that the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education study issues pertaining to qualifications for membership on a school board

Impact

The resolution's implications for state laws involve potential changes to the qualifications for individuals seeking to serve on school boards. By mandating a study that focuses on educational standards and the backgrounds of potential school board members, it could lead to legislative recommendations which, if adopted, would reshape the requirements for effective governance in Louisiana's educational institutions. This could enhance accountability and ensure that members have a minimum level of education and conduct, thus fostering a more competent leadership structure within the state's school systems.

Summary

House Resolution 171, presented by Representative Steve Carter, calls upon the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) to conduct a comprehensive study concerning the qualifications required for membership on school boards within Louisiana. The resolution highlights concerns that current laws do not mandate school board members to possess a high school diploma or its equivalent, nor do they address previous criminal convictions which could impact a member's eligibility. This study aims to evaluate the advisability of setting such requirements and examining how other states manage similar issues to promote educational effectiveness.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR171 appears generally supportive among proponents of educational reform who believe in establishing higher standards for school board qualifications. They argue that adopting stricter criteria could benefit students by ensuring that individuals in these positions have the requisite knowledge and integrity. However, there may also be a measure of contention among those who view such requirements as potentially exclusionary or unnecessary for individuals who could still contribute valuable perspectives despite lacking formal educational achievements.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HR171 arise from the debate over the implications of restricting eligibility for school board members based on educational standards and criminal records. Critics argue that such limitations could disqualify capable candidates and reduce diversity on school boards, while supporters assert that these requirements are crucial for ensuring that board members are adequately prepared to make informed decisions on educational policies. This tension between maintaining inclusive representation and ensuring qualified leadership encapsulates the core of the ongoing discussions around the resolution.