Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB114

Introduced
3/12/12  
Refer
3/12/12  
Report Pass
4/3/12  
Engrossed
4/10/12  
Refer
4/11/12  
Report Pass
5/9/12  
Enrolled
5/23/12  
Chaptered
5/31/12  

Caption

Amends the advance directive statute to conform it with the general consent statute regarding the authorized persons order of priority. (8/1/12)

Impact

The primary impact of SB 114 is on laws surrounding patient autonomy and medical decision-making. By establishing a clear hierarchy of who can make healthcare decisions for those unable to do so, the bill intends to streamline procedures for healthcare providers while ensuring that patients' wishes are honored as closely as possible. This legislative change is expected to simplify the processes involved when a patient is incapacitated and has not expressed their preferences prior to their incapacity.

Summary

Senate Bill 114, introduced by Senator Mills, aims to amend and reenact the advance directive statute in Louisiana. This bill seeks to clarify the order of priority for making medical declarations on behalf of patients who are qualified but unable to communicate or have not previously made a declaration. The amendments proposed include specific instructions for designating individuals authorized to make such declarations, acknowledging the presence of multiple individuals with the right to act on behalf of the patient.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 114 appears to be largely favorable, as evidenced by the unanimous vote of 95-0 during its passage in the House. Supporters argue that the bill makes significant improvements to existing laws by providing greater clarity and structure in crucial medical decisions. This positive reception may reflect a broader commitment to enhance patient rights and ensure that healthcare decisions align with patients' values and preferences.

Contention

While there may not have been substantial public contention surrounding SB 114, it did touch on critical issues related to medical ethics and patient rights. Questions surrounding who should have the authority to make decisions on behalf of incapacitated individuals can be contentious; however, the clear prioritization of authority in the bill aims to mitigate any ambiguity or disputes among family members or guardians. Ultimately, the bill represents an important refinement of existing legal frameworks to protect vulnerable patients.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.