Louisiana Senate Bill SB247

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Refer: 4/17/12
• Report Pass: 4/30/12
• Engrossed: 5/2/12
• Refer: 5/3/12
• Refer: 5/16/12
• Refer: 5/17/12
• Report Pass: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 6/4/12
• Chaptered: 6/12/12
• Passed: 6/12/12

Caption

Creates the Central La. Technical Community College. (gov sig) (EG1 +$2,190,750 SG RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB 247 will have significant implications for the Louisiana Community and Technical College System. By creating the Central Louisiana Technical Community College, the bill is expected to increase postsecondary educational access and promote skills development in the local workforce. It explicitly states that the college will be managed by the Board of Supervisors of Community and Technical Colleges and will provide educational services that meet the demands of employers in the area. This could lead to better alignment between educational outcomes and job market needs, addressing local economic challenges.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 247 aims to establish the Central Louisiana Technical Community College as a public institution for postsecondary education. The bill outlines the management, supervision, and operation of the college, which is designed to provide various educational programs tailored to the needs of students and communities in central Louisiana. These programs include career and technical education, adult basic education, workforce development training, and transfer degrees. The establishment of this college is seen as a move to enhance educational opportunities in the region.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 247 appears to be largely positive among proponents who recognize the necessity of expanding technical and vocational education in Louisiana. Supporters believe that the creation of the Central Louisiana Technical Community College will facilitate job training that is critical for economic growth. However, potential issues related to funding and the effectiveness of program accreditation might be points of contention, with concerns about sufficient resources to ensure quality education.

Contention

While there seems to be general agreement on the benefits of increased technical education, some stakeholders may raise concerns regarding the adequacy of funding and operational support for the new college. Additionally, continuous oversight by the Board of Regents and the assurance of regional accreditation are critical factors that stakeholders will watch closely to ensure the college meets educational standards. Thus, the discussion about SB 247 might involve balancing local educational needs with broader institutional mandates.