Louisiana Senate Bill SB285

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/9/12
• Engrossed: 4/11/12
• Refer: 4/12/12
• Refer: 4/17/12
• Report Pass: 5/8/12
• Enrolled: 5/28/12
• Chaptered: 6/5/12
• Passed: 6/5/12

Caption

Dedicates a portion of certain tax receipts for fire protection at Camp Minden. (6/30/12) (EN NO IMPACT GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of SB 285 signifies a legislative commitment to ensuring adequate fire protection services at a critical military installation. By designating a specific fund for fire protection, the bill ensures that resources are systematically available, thereby potentially increasing safety for personnel and operations at Camp Minden. The bill also provides a clear framework for contracting independent fire districts to deliver these essential services, fostering collaboration between state governance and local fire authorities.

Summary

Senate Bill 285, introduced by Senator Adley, establishes the Camp Minden Fire Protection Fund, dedicated to securing fire protection services for the National Guard Installation at Camp Minden. This special fund will receive an annual allocation of $50,000 from the Louisiana Fire Marshal Fund after certain statutory requirements are met. The allocation aims to enhance the safety and fire protection measures necessary for the operations at Camp Minden, in recognition of the significant military activities conducted there.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 285 appears to be overwhelmingly positive among legislators, as indicated by its unanimous passage in the House with a vote of 95 in favor and none against. This widespread support suggests that lawmakers recognize the importance of dedicated funding for fire protection, particularly in light of the strategic importance of Camp Minden. The bill aligns with broader public safety objectives and reflects a proactive approach to managing risks associated with military installations.

Contention

While the bill received unanimous support, potential points of contention may arise regarding the adequacy of the funding amount or the administrative processes involved in managing the fund. Critics could argue that relying on a capped annual transfer may not sufficiently address the evolving needs for fire protection, especially in times of increased military activity. There might also be concerns about ensuring the efficiency and effectiveness of the contracted services, as well as the legislative oversight of the fund's utilization.