Louisiana Senate Bill SB611

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Requires BESE to transfer MFP funds to entities providing instruction to certain students preparing to take the General Education Development test. (8/1/12)

Impact

The implications of SB611 are significant for local education systems as it guarantees funding for programs that support at-risk youth in obtaining their GEDs. The bill mandates that funding allocated to these programs be equal to what would have been provided if the students were enrolled in their local public school system. This move is aimed at enhancing educational opportunities and providing alternative routes for students who might otherwise drop out of traditional high school paths.

Summary

Senate Bill 611 requires that students aged 16 to 18 who enroll in approved General Education Development (GED) preparation programs be counted by local school boards for funding purposes under the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP). This ensures that such students are eligible for both state and federal funding as part of the educational system. SB611 empowers the Louisiana Community and Technical College System (LCTCS) to work with private educational providers, ensuring that those providers meet established qualifications before they offer GED preparatory courses. This initiative aims to increase accessibility and support for students seeking to complete their education through the GED pathway.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB611 appears generally supportive, particularly among education advocates who recognize the need for alternative education routes for youth. However, there may also be concerns regarding the effectiveness and oversight of private providers tasked with delivering these educational services. The ongoing discussions illustrate an underlying goal of improving educational outcomes for students while ensuring adequate funding mechanisms are in place.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB611 could arise from the reliance on private providers for education. Stakeholders may question the accountability and quality of education provided by these entities, particularly concerning student performance metrics. Furthermore, discussions may center around the impact of funding allocations and whether or not the distribution of resources adequately supports the intended outcomes of increasing GED completion rates among young students.