Louisiana Senate Bill SCR35

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/12
• Refer: 3/27/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Passed: 4/3/12
• Engrossed: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/4/12
• Report Pass: 5/1/12

Caption

Requests DOTD study the feasibility and costs to provide adequate lighting and needed maintenance on bridges on the state highway system over the Mississippi River.

Impact

The impact of SCR35, if acted upon, could lead to enhanced safety measures on the Mississippi River bridges, as the introduction of adequate lighting and maintenance could reduce accident risks during night-time or low-visibility conditions. The study would provide important data on necessary improvements, potentially influencing future funding allocations and policy decisions regarding infrastructure investment in Louisiana. This aligns with broader state interests in ensuring that transportation networks are functional and safe for the public.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 35, introduced by Senator Brown, urges the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) to conduct a study on the feasibility and costs associated with providing adequate lighting and maintenance for bridges on the state highway system that cross the Mississippi River. The resolution highlights the importance of these bridges as vital transportation links for citizens, visitors, and businesses in Louisiana. By requesting this study, the resolution aims to ensure that these key infrastructures are properly maintained and safe for use.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCR35 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who prioritize infrastructure safety and maintenance. The acknowledgment of the necessity for proper lighting and upkeep reflects a consensus on the importance of these bridges. However, as the resolution is an invitation for further study, some stakeholders might see it as a preliminary step that requires careful consideration and additional resources, which could be contentious depending on budgetary constraints.

Contention

While the resolution itself does not appear to create direct contention, it opens a discussion about funding and resource allocation for infrastructure projects. Critics might raise concerns regarding the feasibility of implementing proposed improvements given current budget limitations, potentially pitting infrastructure needs against other public service funding. There may also be debates around the effectiveness of such measures in improving safety versus the costs incurred for the study and any subsequent implementation of recommendations.