Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB234

Introduced
4/8/13  

Caption

Requires that owner identification information be marked on every removable dental prosthesis fabricated by a dentist or pursuant to a dentist's order

Impact

The bill is likely to have significant implications for the practice of dentistry within Louisiana. By requiring that identification be embedded in prosthetics, HB234 seeks to address issues related to lost or misassigned dental devices. Additionally, the Louisiana State Board of Dentistry has the authority to establish penalties for non-compliance, thus tightening the regulatory framework surrounding dental practices. Overall, this law aims to protect both practitioners and patients by creating clear ownership of dental prostheses.

Summary

House Bill 234, introduced by Representative Patrick Williams, mandates that every complete upper and lower denture and removable dental prosthesis fabricated by a licensed dentist must include owner identification information. This identification, which is supposed to be marked on the prosthesis, must include the patient's name and, where appropriate, their social security number. The bill aims to enhance accountability and traceability in dental practices, ensuring that prosthetics can be linked back to the patients they were created for. Exceptions are provided for scenarios where markings are deemed impractical or unsafe according to the professional judgment of the dentist.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB234 appears to be generally supportive among dental professionals and medical advocacy groups. Supporters argue that the bill will improve standards of care and patient safety by ensuring that dental instruments can be accurately attributed to specific patients. However, there are concerns from some practitioners about the potential for increased administrative burdens and liability issues if there are difficulties in fulfilling the identification requirements. The debate suggests a focus on balancing patient rights with practical considerations in dental practice.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, there may be points of contention related to the bill's requirements. Some members within the dental community have raised concerns regarding the feasibility of marking prosthetics in a manner that is both compliant with the law and still allows for the provision of safe, high-quality dental devices. The focus on social security numbers for identification may also raise privacy concerns among patients. As the bill progresses, it may be necessary to refine certain provisions or clarify the exceptions to ensure a smooth implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.