Louisiana House Bill HB32

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Dedicates a portion of mineral income from False River to operations, management, and improvements including aquatic weed management in the lake (OR DECREASE GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 32 is expected to create the False River Management Account within the Conservation Fund, allowing for more structured and dedicated funding towards the upkeep and ecological health of False River. This bill emphasizes the importance of maintaining aquatic ecosystems and addresses potential concerns regarding water quality and control of invasive plant species through improved management funded by state resources.

Summary

House Bill 32 is a legislative initiative that focuses on dedicating a portion of the state's mineral income derived from activity on the water bottoms of False River. Specifically, the bill proposes that 10% of the revenue from leases, royalties, and bonuses obtained by the state must be allocated towards the operations, management, improvements, and aquatic weed control for False River. This allocation is capped at a maximum of $100,000 per year, which seeks to ensure that the revenues generated from state lands are reinvested back into local environmental management efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 32 appears to be supportive, with notable advocacy from environmental groups that recognize the necessity for sustainable management of aquatics in False River. The sentiment surrounding the bill resonates with stakeholders who prioritize environmental health and resource management, although specific oppositional viewpoints have not been highlighted in the available sources. Overall, the legislative framework intends to promote ecological prosperity through state-funded initiatives.

Contention

One point of contention may arise regarding the distribution and management of the funds appropriated each year. As the funds are subject to annual legislative approval by the relevant House and Senate committees, there may be debates over priorities and allocation of resources. Moreover, while the intent is to manage False River effectively, stakeholders might raise concerns about whether the funding will be sufficient or appropriately directed towards addressing all necessary aspects of river health and stewardship.