Louisiana House Bill HB492

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Provides for the functions and responsibilities of Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board relative to certain projects

Impact

The enactment of HB 492 may lead to a more proactive approach in managing coastal protection efforts. By allowing the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board to use its own resources, the state may see improved project implementation timelines and potentially reduced costs associated with hiring external contractors. This could enhance Louisiana’s capacity to address critical coastal challenges, including erosion and flooding, which are vital for the state's environmental health and economic stability.

Summary

House Bill 492 serves to amend a provision concerning the functions and responsibilities of the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board in Louisiana. This bill specifically addresses the board's capacity to utilize its own resources—whether through employees or equipment—to satisfy mitigation requirements that stem from integrated coastal protection projects. The bill aims to streamline the process through which the board meets its obligations under existing environmental regulations, thereby enhancing efficiency in project execution.

Sentiment

Sentiments regarding HB 492 seem to be generally supportive among environmental advocates and legislators who prioritize coastal protection initiatives. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step that empowers the state to act swiftly in mitigating environmental impacts. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of local governance and capacity in dealing with unique coastal challenges, which the bill directly addresses by allocating state resources to important projects.

Contention

While the bill generally received positive feedback, some contention revolves around concerns that the broad language used—such as 'resources'—may lead to ambiguity regarding the use of state resources. Critics may worry about potential misallocation or overreach in the use of state manpower and equipment. Furthermore, there is a challenge in maintaining accountability, ensuring that the authority operates within the intended scope of ecological and community benefits while navigating state law.