Provides with respect to the impoundment of livestock found at large (OR INCREASE LF EX See Note)
Impact
In terms of financial implications, the bill proposes to increase the impounding fee from $2 to $6 per day for the care and feeding of each animal, alongside the initial fee to reclaim the livestock. This change is aimed at better reflecting the actual costs incurred by authorities in the care of impounded livestock, thereby potentially influencing how local governments manage roaming livestock situations within their jurisdictions. The bill also stipulates that owners shall be notified within 24 hours after the livestock is impounded, ensuring that they are aware of the status of their property.
Summary
House Bill 72 aims to amend existing regulations regarding the impoundment of livestock found roaming at large on state highways. The proposed changes would authorize not only sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, constables, and justices of the peace but also marshals to take custody of and impound livestock. This expansion of authority requires immediate notification to the deputy secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections regarding livestock taken into custody, enhancing the oversight of such situations.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB72 appears largely supportive within the legislative discussions, particularly among those who advocate for more streamlined processes in livestock management. Proponents argue that the bill addresses current gaps in law enforcement authority regarding livestock impoundment, which could enhance overall safety on the highways. However, there may be concerns about the increased fees and how they will be perceived by livestock owners, raising questions about the affordability of reclaiming impounded animals.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between enhanced authority for law enforcement personnel and the rights of livestock owners. While the bill aims to provide a more structured approach to impoundment, there might be reluctance from livestock owners who find the revised fees burdensome. Additionally, the empowerment of marshals could lead to discussions about the qualification and training required for those taking custody of livestock, emphasizing the need to ensure that their involvement does not lead to conflicts or misunderstandings in the handling of impounded animals.
To Amend The Law Regarding Livestock; To Amend The Law Regarding Livestock Running At Large; To Amend The Law Regarding Fencing; And To Repeal The Law Regarding Fencing Districts.