Louisiana House Bill HB84

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Torshia Wilson, et al v. DOTD, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB84 is significant in that it illustrates the legislative process of allocating state funds for judicial settlements. Appropriating these funds from the General Fund reinforces the principle that the state must acknowledge and fulfill its financial responsibilities as determined by the court. By providing the stipulated amount to Torshia Wilson for the judgment awarded, the bill helps in maintaining the state’s legal commitments and ensures that obligations arising from court rulings are appropriately addressed.

Summary

House Bill 84, introduced by Representative Barrow, addresses the appropriations necessary to pay a consent judgment from a legal case entitled 'Torshia Wilson, et al v. DOTD, et al'. The bill specifically appropriates a total of $2,000 from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2013-2014. This funding is designated to fulfill the state's obligation resulting from the court's decision in the lawsuit involving the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, along with the City of Baton Rouge and other parties involved in the case.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB84 appears to be neutral, focused primarily on the administrative necessity of fulfilling a legal judgment rather than evoking wider public opinion. As it pertains to a specific case, the bill does not invoke significant debate among lawmakers or the public. Most discussions likely revolve around the necessity of adhering to legal obligations rather than potential divisive issues, given that it involves a financial appropriation and a consent judgment that has already been decided in court.

Contention

There seem to be minimal points of contention publicly attributed to HB84, as it simply functions as a mechanism for financial appropriation related to an existing legal obligation. Given that this is essentially an administrative bill, the discussions preceding its approval would mainly concern the justification for the appropriations being made, including any implications regarding the respective departments involved. However, it avoids the political controversies that often accompany broader legislation.