Requests that the United States Army Corps of Engineers maintain a minimum of 9 foot deep by 200 foot wide channel to allow safe and reliable barge transportation on the J. Bennett Johnston Waterway
HCR109 is primarily focused on ensuring the operational capability of the locks and dams on the Red River, allowing for uninterrupted navigation that has significant economic implications. Previous studies have highlighted that the Red River Waterway project has attracted billions in new investment, created jobs, and increased household earnings in the region. By preserving the navigability of this waterway, the resolution aims to sustain and potentially enhance these economic benefits, thus reinforcing the importance of the Red River as a central asset for commerce in the area.
House Concurrent Resolution 109 (HCR109) urges and requests the United States Army Corps of Engineers to maintain a specific channel depth and width on the J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, which is essential for safe barge transportation. Specifically, the resolution calls for a minimum depth of nine feet and a width of two hundred feet to ensure reliable navigation throughout the year. This legislative action is positioned as a critical step to protect and enhance both commercial and recreational activities on the Red River, which is a vital resource for the surrounding communities.
The sentiment surrounding HCR109 appears largely supportive, as it aligns with broader goals of promoting economic development and ensuring efficient transportation infrastructure. The proposal received a unanimous vote in favor during legislative discussions, indicating a strong consensus among lawmakers regarding the importance of maintaining navigable waters for both industry and recreation. The consensus view reflects a shared understanding of the economic benefits tied to the waterway.
While HCR109 has garnered broad support, some discussions may have highlighted concerns related to federal oversight and the capacity of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to respond to state-level requests. The resolution emphasizes the necessity of operating locks and dams at all times, which could be seen as an additional demand on federal resources. Some stakeholders might question the feasibility of maintaining such rigorous operational standards, particularly in light of budget constraints or competing priorities within federal infrastructure projects. However, the overall tone of discussions remains focused on collaboration between state and federal agencies.