Louisiana House Bill HCR151

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/21/13
• Engrossed: 5/22/13
• Refer: 5/23/13

Caption

Requests the state treasurer to report on credit and debit card transactions

Impact

The resolution is expected to aid in the evaluation of the current credit and debit card payment systems in place at the state level. By requiring the state treasurer to report on various aspects, including fees charged and the number of contracted providers, HCR151 seeks to enhance the financial management practices of the state government. This ensures that Louisiana entities, if they are present, have a fair chance to be considered for providing credit and debit card services, potentially allowing for improved financial dealings within state agencies.

Summary

HCR151 is a House Concurrent Resolution that urges the state treasurer of Louisiana to provide a report by January 15, 2014, detailing credit and debit card transactions made for payments to state agencies. This initiative reflects an ongoing effort to understand and perhaps optimize how the state handles electronic payments, ensuring transparency in financial transactions involving card payments. The resolution indicates that while state agencies are authorized to accept these payment methods, there is a need for clarity regarding the transaction processes and associated costs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR151 appears to be pragmatic, focusing on accountability and efficiency within state finances. Legislators and stakeholders likely view the demand for a report as a constructive measure aimed at improving the state's financial operations. The emphasis on potentially engaging more local providers indicates a supportive stance towards local businesses and fostering economic opportunities within the state.

Contention

While HCR151 does not seem to present direct points of contention as it primarily seeks a report rather than enact specific policy changes, the assumptions surrounding the usage of credit and debit cards in state transactions could raise questions about the adequacy of existing contracting practices and transparency. Discussions around increasing the number of local providers might lead to debates concerning the challenge of balancing cost-effectiveness with the opportunity to support local businesses.