Louisiana House Bill HR214

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/6/13
• Passed: 6/6/13

Caption

Requests the House Committee on Education to study issues relative to the MFP

Impact

If HR214 is enacted, it could significantly reshape how education funding is structured in Louisiana. The study aims to evaluate critical aspects of the MFP formula, including the nature of costs covered, particularly in terms of retirement funding. This analysis can have important implications for how future appropriations are made and how funding is perceived by the public. Additionally, establishing clearer guidelines for the formula could potentially lead to a fairer distribution of educational resources across different school districts.

Summary

House Resolution 214 (HR214) calls for the House Committee on Education to conduct a comprehensive study regarding the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP), which serves as the basis for public school funding in Louisiana. The resolution highlights concerns regarding the historical transition of the MFP from a cost-driven formula to one mainly based on anticipated appropriations, which has led to confusion among stakeholders about its purpose and function. Furthermore, it addresses issues such as the overlap of the MFP with funding for charter schools and online education, as well as the misallocation of MFP funds that detract from direct public school expenditures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR214 appears to be largely supportive among education advocates who see the value in a thorough examination of the MFP. Stakeholders such as school boards and educators are encouraged by the prospect of clarifying funding sources and ensuring that public education resources are utilized effectively. There is an underlying concern, however, regarding the complexity and potential bureaucratic challenges that could arise from restructuring the funding formula as proposed in the study.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the future of the MFP and how changes could affect various stakeholders involved in Louisiana's education system. Some educators and school administrators may fear that isolating certain costs, such as retirement, could lead to further budget cuts in crucial areas of student support. Moreover, the question of whether the study should be open to public scrutiny could spark debate over transparency and stakeholder involvement in any proposed changes to the MFP.