Creates and provides for the Southern Heights Neighborhood Crime Prevention District. (8/1/13)
Impact
The enactment of SB 25 allows for the imposition of a parcel fee on property owners in the Southern Heights neighborhood to fund these initiatives. This fee can be set at a maximum of $150 annually per parcel and requires voter approval, ensuring that the local community has a say in funding these public safety enhancements. The district will operate under the authority of East Baton Rouge Parish and has the power to collect and manage these funds as stipulated in the budgetary guidelines provided in the bill.
Summary
Senate Bill 25 establishes the Southern Heights Neighborhood Crime Prevention and Improvement District in East Baton Rouge Parish. The bill aims to enhance safety and security for residents by improving law enforcement presence and funding neighborhood beautification efforts. It creates a governance structure, including a board of commissioners appointed by various local representatives, ensuring community involvement in leadership and decision-making processes.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 25 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among local stakeholders who view the establishment of the district as a positive step toward enhancing neighborhood safety. By proposing additional funding for law enforcement and community improvements, the bill addresses public safety concerns that have resonated with residents. However, there might be some apprehension regarding the financial implications of the parcel fee, which could affect property owners depending on their financial situation.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the governance of the district and the responsibilities of the board members. While the bill outlines a clear structure for appointments and operations, questions about accountability and transparency in managing the funds and initiatives might be raised by residents. Additionally, discussions about the extent of local governance in light of state oversight could spur debate, particularly around the balance of power between local and state authorities when it comes to community safety and funding initiatives.