Louisiana Senate Bill SCR25

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/18/13
• Refer: 4/22/13
• Report Pass: 5/8/13
• Passed: 5/13/13
• Engrossed: 5/13/13
• Refer: 5/14/13
• Report Pass: 5/29/13

Caption

Requests the LSU Board of Supervisors and the governor to keep the Huey P. Long Medical Center open and viable.

Impact

The resolution emphasizes the socioeconomic implications of keeping the Huey P. Long Medical Center operational, noting that it is one of the largest employers in the region. By highlighting the employment aspect, the resolution connects healthcare provisions to local economic stability. The facility's reputation as one of the best medical training centers in Louisiana is noted, which may also influence future healthcare professionals to serve in the area, enhancing the quality of healthcare available to the community.

Summary

SCR25, a concurrent resolution, urges the Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors and the governor to maintain the operations of the Huey P. Long Medical Center in Pineville. This medical center plays a critical role in delivering healthcare services to the region, particularly to low- and moderate-income individuals, including those reliant on Medicare and Medicaid. Its closure would result in significant healthcare access issues for the residents not only of Rapides Parish but also for those in at least eight neighboring parishes, underscoring its importance in the state’s healthcare network.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SCR25 reflect a general sentiment of support for the preservation of the Huey P. Long Medical Center. Lawmakers express a unified recognition of the vital services provided by the facility, particularly in terms of public health and community welfare. There is a palpable concern over the potential adverse effects of any decision that might jeopardize the center's operations, indicating a commitment to maintaining healthcare accessibility for vulnerable populations.

Contention

While the resolution itself does not appear to encounter significant opposition, the underlying tension regarding budgetary constraints faced by the state suggests potential future debates. The balance between governmental fiscal responsibility and the necessity for accessible healthcare might provoke discussions on funding allocations. Thus, while SCR25 serves a definitive purpose in supporting healthcare access, it also opens the door to considerations on the broader implications of state-managed healthcare sustainability.