Directs the commissioner of administration to ensure that the name and contact information of each custodian of public records of an agency be included on the website of the agency.
If enacted, SCR65 would significantly impact state laws related to public records access by ensuring that the identity of the records custodian is clearly communicated to the public. This legislative directive would facilitate easier access for citizens seeking to examine or obtain copies of public documents, thereby promoting a more informed public. By implementing this measure, the state aims to uphold and reinforce the principles laid out in the Public Records Law, which supports citizens' rights to access information.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 65 (SCR65) aims to enhance transparency within Louisiana's executive branch by mandating that each state agency, department, board, and commission publish the name and contact information of their custodian of public records on their respective websites. The resolution emphasizes the importance of public access to records as a fundamental right guaranteed under the state's constitution, outlining the responsibilities of custodians in responding to public inquiries.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SCR65 is positive, reflecting a widespread agreement on the necessity for transparency in government. Legislators and advocacy groups alike have shown support for the resolution, considering it a step towards better communication between government entities and the public. By promoting accountability in public office, the resolution is anticipated to strengthen trust between the citizens and their government.
While there appears to be broad support for SCR65, some potential points of contention may arise regarding the implementation and execution of these requirements. There are concerns about how consistently agencies will comply with the mandate and the potential for varying interpretations of what constitutes adequate contact information. Nevertheless, these issues are likely to be minor compared to the overall benefits of increased transparency and public accessibility to government records.