Resolves that a committee of seven members be appointed to act with a similar House committee to notify the governor that the legislature has convened and organized and is prepared to receive his communications.
The impact of SR2 is largely procedural, as it streamlines the process of initiation for the legislative session. By appointing a committee for the purpose of informing the governor, the resolution reinforces the established protocol in which the legislature operates. Such measures are important for maintaining the formality and structure required in the interactions between the legislative and executive branches of government. The resolution does not directly alter any state laws but rather reinforces existing frameworks surrounding communication and cooperation in governance.
Senate Resolution No. 2, authored by Senator Broome, serves to establish a committee within the legislature to facilitate communication with the governor. Specifically, the resolution mandates the appointment of a committee comprising seven members who will work alongside a corresponding committee from the House of Representatives. The primary purpose of this committee is to formally notify the governor that the legislature has convened and organized, and it stands ready to receive any communications he wishes to present. This procedural resolution is a customary practice observed at the onset of legislative sessions, ensuring a smooth start to the legislative process.
The sentiment surrounding SR2 is generally positive, as it is a standard legislative practice that promotes order and cooperation among the different branches of government. Legislators typically view such resolutions as necessary for building a foundation for the legislative session. There is little room for contention in the discussions of procedural resolutions like SR2, as they are designed to facilitate the functions of government rather than to introduce controversial policy changes.
Notable points of contention are unlikely to arise in relation to SR2 because it simply outlines a procedural mechanism without the implications of those found in substantive legislative bills. However, as with any resolution or action within a legislative context, dissenting opinions could emerge regarding the size of the committee or the choice of its members, but such disagreements tend to be minimal and procedural rather than ideological.