Designates May 29, 2013, as "4-H Day" at the legislature and commends the state officers of 4-H.
The resolution serves to commend and encourage the ongoing development of the 4-H program in Louisiana, a vital initiative that fosters the personal and educational growth of youth across the state. By establishing a specific day to honor and promote 4-H, the resolution also aims to raise public awareness about the opportunities available to youth, encouraging more involvement in community and agricultural activities. It presents an avenue for state officials and community members to recognize the achievements of young individuals engaged in the program.
Senate Resolution No. 99 designates May 29, 2013, as '4-H Day' at the legislature of Louisiana. The resolution acknowledges the contributions of the Louisiana 4-H Youth Development program, which empowers young individuals through various initiatives focused on citizenship, healthy living, and the sciences. It highlights the skill development opportunities provided to participants, which include leadership, community service, and practical skills in areas like animal science and nutrition. More than 240,000 youth participants in the program demonstrate its significant impact.
The sentiment surrounding SR99 is predominantly positive, celebrating the achievements and roles of the 4-H program in enhancing the lives of young people. Lawmakers are inclined to support initiatives that bolster youth engagement and civic responsibility, with the resolution reflecting a general consensus on the importance of fostering leadership and life skills in youth. The involvement and recognition of youth leaders at the capitol further emphasize the legislative body's commitment to local programs that contribute to community development.
Notably, while the resolution is largely commendatory, discussions around youth programs can sometimes raise questions about funding and resource allocation within the state's educational and community service frameworks. Nevertheless, SR99 primarily focuses on recognition rather than enacting policy changes, meaning it does not carry significant points of contention in its discussions.