Louisiana House Bill HB1063

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/25/14
• Refer: 3/26/14

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Rebecca Dominique wife of/and Alvin Dominique, Jr. v. State of Louisiana DOTD"

Impact

The approval of HB 1063 signifies the Louisiana legislature's commitment to honoring judicial decisions and ensuring that funds are available to meet state financial obligations arising from court orders. This act not only reflects on the fiscal accountability of state agencies but also sets a precedent for how the state handles similar cases involving financial judgments. The appropriation can affect future budgeting processes, particularly in allocating financial resources for legal settlements and obligations.

Summary

House Bill 1063 aims to appropriate funds from the General Fund of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2014-2015, specifically for the payment of a consent judgment related to the case of 'Rebecca Dominique wife of/and Alvin Dominique, Jr. v. State of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development.' The bill proposes a total amount of $60,000 to be paid out to satisfy this legal obligation stemming from a court decision. This action is intended to settle the matter without further legal disputes or delays.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1063 appears to be largely neutral, as it deals primarily with a straightforward financial appropriation to meet a legal requirement. While proponents of financial accountability may view the bill positively as a necessary step towards fulfilling legal obligations, there are fewer emotional stakes involved compared to other types of legislation that may directly impact constituents or involve contentious policy issues. The discussions were mostly procedural with general agreement on the necessity of the appropriations bill.

Contention

There were few notable points of contention regarding HB 1063, mainly because it is focused on fulfilling a pre-existing legal obligation rather than introducing new policy changes or disputes. However, discussions may have touched upon aspects such as budgetary constraints and the appropriateness of funding allocations from the General Fund for legal judgments. Nonetheless, no significant opposition or arguments against the bill were reported, which often indicates broad legislative support for resolving legal financial responsibilities.