Louisiana House Bill HB1032

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/13/14
• Refer: 3/17/14

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Joan Beauregard v. State of Louisiana through DOTD"

Impact

The approval of HB 1032 allows the state to fulfill its financial responsibilities arising from a legal judgment, thereby ensuring compliance with court mandates. This appropriation may impact the financial planning of the Department of Transportation and Development as it addresses unforeseen legal expenses originating from judgments against it. While the amount is relatively modest in the broader fiscal context, it underscores the importance of securing funding for legal settlements to preserve state legal integrity and avoid further legal complications.

Summary

House Bill 1032 is an appropriation bill that allocates funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2014-2015. Specifically, the bill appropriates the sum of $120,000 to cover a consent judgment from the lawsuit 'Joan Beauregard v. State of Louisiana through DOTD', indicating a legal obligation on the part of the state government. The legislation outlines the necessary funds for settling this particular case brought against the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD).

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment towards HB 1032 appears to be neutral, largely reflecting a necessary financial measure rather than a deeply contentious issue. Since the bill deals with procedural aspects of funding a legal obligation, it is not expected to arouse significant public or political opposition or support. Legislators typically view such appropriations as essential for the functioning and accountability of state agencies, given that they represent compliance with court rulings.

Contention

Although HB 1032 is not characterized by major points of contention, the nature of state appropriations for legal judgments often raises discussions around accountability and the allocation of state resources. Questions may arise regarding how such funds are monitored and the circumstances that led to the lawsuit. However, due to the nature of this specific bill, robust debate or significant pushback from legislators or the public is unlikely.