Louisiana House Bill HB1031

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/13/14
• Refer: 3/17/14

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Larry F. Mitchell v. State of Louisiana DOTD, et al" consolidated with "Louise Griffin v. State of Louisiana, through the DOTD"

Impact

The passage of HB 1031 would provide direct financial support for settling a specific legal claim against the state, which is significant for maintaining the integrity of the state government and upholding legal agreements. By fulfilling this judgment, the state affirms its commitment to addressing legal responsibilities, thus potentially preventing further legal complications or additional costs that could arise from unpaid judgments. Such appropriations are crucial, as they directly impact how state funds are managed and allocated in the context of legal liabilities.

Summary

House Bill 1031 authorizes the appropriation of $10,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2014-2015. The allocated funds are designated to pay a consent judgment awarded to Louise Griffin in a legal suit against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) that relates to a consolidated case with Larry F. Mitchell. This measure is a reflection of the state's financial responsibilities in fulfilling court-ordered judgments, ensuring that legal obligations are met in order to maintain public trust and compliance with the justice system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1031 is largely administrative and procedural; it does not ignite major public controversy or political contention. Legislative discussions typically revolve around the necessity of fulfilling legal obligations and the implications of appropriating state funds towards these ends. While specific members may advocate for fiscal responsibility, the general consensus regarding such appropriative measures is often neutral, focusing instead on legal compliance rather than political agendas.

Contention

Although there might not be notable points of contention specifically mentioned in the context of HB 1031, the underlying issue regarding appropriating state funds for court judgments can lead to broader discussions around state budget allocations. There may be debates about prioritization of funds, transparency in the disbursement process, and the fairness of the judicial system that awards such judgments. However, since this bill addresses a specific settlement, the conversation does not appear to be heavily contested.