Requires rulemaking agencies to publish on the Internet certain information concerning proposed rules and fees (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The implications of HB 322 on state laws are significant, as it alters how administrative procedures are conducted by introducing a standardized requirement for online publication of information. By establishing specific deadlines for publication and ensuring that all relevant information is accessible to the public, the bill aims to improve the efficiency and responsiveness of state agencies. The obligation to archive this information for at least one year further strengthens accountability and oversight, potentially influencing how regulations are formulated and enacted in the future.
Summary
House Bill 322 is designed to enhance transparency in government operations by requiring state agencies to publish certain details online related to their rulemaking processes and fees. The bill mandates that each agency, whether it has its own website or not, must provide a set of specified information including descriptions of rules or fees, proposed changes, contact details for inquiries, and opportunities for public comments. This initiative seeks to promote greater public engagement and accessibility to governmental functions, allowing citizens to stay informed about important regulatory changes that may affect them.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 322 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, particularly those prioritizing government transparency and accountability. Advocates for the bill argue that it represents a positive step toward open governance and fosters public trust in state institutions. However, there may be concerns about the implementation of these requirements and whether all agencies will be able to meet the expected standards, which could lead to additional administrative burdens.
Contention
While the bill advances a laudable goal of increasing transparency, one point of contention might include the potential challenges faced by smaller agencies that lack the resources to comply with the new publishing requirements. Concerns have also been voiced regarding the effectiveness of such measures in genuinely increasing public engagement. Critics may argue that simply publishing information does not guarantee it will be accessed or understood by the public, raising questions about the true impact of HB 322 on fostering active participation in governance.
Provides for processes, including public comment, to identify agency rules that may be contrary to law, outdated, unnecessary, overly complex, or burdensome (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Provides that a website established and maintained by the commissioner of administration shall be the official journal of the state and requires him to post certain information about boards and commissions on it (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Requires publication of certain contracts and reports on the Internet and and creates task force which is authorized to study and make annual assessments of state contracts. (7/1/16) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.