Louisiana House Bill HB342

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 5/28/14
• Engrossed: 5/29/14
• Refer: 6/1/14
• Report Pass: 6/2/14

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Creates and provides for a Department of Elderly Affairs (EG1 SEE FISC NOTE See Note)

Impact

If ratified, HB 342 will fundamentally change how the state approaches the responsibilities and services provided to its elderly residents. By creating a dedicated Department of Elderly Affairs that is not subject to the existing limit of twenty departments in the executive branch, it aims to ensure that elderly issues receive focused attention and resources. This change adds a layer of accountability and expertise dedicated solely to the elderly, potentially leading to better service delivery and advocacy for this demographic's unique needs.

Summary

House Bill 342 is a constitutional amendment proposed to establish a Department of Elderly Affairs within the executive branch of the state government of Louisiana. This amendment aims to create an organized approach to meet the needs of Louisiana residents aged sixty and above. The department will be responsible for planning, monitoring, coordinating, and delivering necessary services specifically tailored to the elderly population. Importantly, this bill prohibits the appropriation of funds for functions managed by the department to any other executive branch entity, ensuring dedicated resources for elderly services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 342 is largely positive among sponsors and advocates for elderly services, as they see it as a necessary evolution in providing adequate care and support to an aging population. Supporters argue that the establishment of a specialized department is critical for effectively addressing the complex needs of older citizens. However, there may be concerns regarding budget allocations and the possible bureaucratic expansion that could accompany the creation of a new department.

Contention

Despite the general support for HB 342, some points of contention may arise, particularly regarding funding priorities and the efficiency of establishing a new department versus enhancing existing services. Critics may voice concerns about government spending and whether the creation of this department will lead to significantly improved outcomes for the elderly or simply result in an increase in administrative costs. Furthermore, ensuring that this new department operates efficiently within the state's budget constraints will be crucial to its success.