Louisiana House Bill HB392

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Requires the state to provide free assistance to local law enforcement agencies for the transfer of surplus equipment and supplies through the Department of Defense Excess Property Program (1033 Program) (OR DECREASE SG RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 392 stands to significantly impact state law regarding the provision of military surplus to local law enforcement. By eliminating service charges imposed by the Louisiana Federal Property Assistance Agency, the bill intends to streamline the process through which local agencies can obtain surplus equipment. This not only facilitates better resource allocation but also underscores the state's commitment to enhancing the operational capabilities of local law enforcement in fulfilling their duties.

Summary

House Bill 392 aims to enhance support for local law enforcement agencies in Louisiana by requiring the state to provide free assistance for the transfer of surplus military equipment and supplies through the Department of Defense Excess Property Program (commonly known as the 1033 Program). This bill mandates that local law enforcement can acquire necessary resources without incurring any costs associated with the state's support, thereby easing the financial burden that may have previously hindered local agencies from accessing essential equipment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 392 reflects a positive reception among law enforcement communities, who often face budget constraints and resource shortages. Supporters of the bill argue that providing free access to surplus military equipment will help bolster public safety and efficiency in police operations. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of increasing militarization of police forces, which could lead to contentious discussions around public safety, community relations, and accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased militarization of police departments, which has raised alarms among civil liberty advocates who worry about the implications for community policing and public trust. Critics may argue that while the bill provides necessary resources, it could unintentionally promote a law enforcement culture that favors military-like responses in community interactions. The balance between providing support to law enforcement and ensuring the protection of civil liberties remains a crucial discussion topic amid the legislative process.