Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB43 Latest Draft

Bill / Chaptered Version

                            2014 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 43
 
 
Page 1 of 3 
House Bill 43 HLS 14RS-386
 
Original 
 
Author:  Representative J. Kevin 
Pearson 
 
Date: March 19, 2014
 
 
LLA Note HB 43 .01
 
 
Organizations Affected: 
Teachers’ Retirement System of 
Louisiana 
 
OR DECREASE APV 
This Note has been prepared by the Actuarial Services Department of the Office of 
the Legislative Auditor.  The attachment of this Note to HB 43 provides 
compliance with the requirements of R.S. 24:52	1. 
 
 
Bill Header:  RETIREMENT/TEACHERS : Provides for application of remaining funds in the Teachers	’ Retirement System of LA.’s 
experience account, after  payment of a permanent benefit increase to eligible retirees and beneficiaries, to specified debt of the system. 
 
Cost Summary: 
 
The estimated actuarial and fiscal impact of the proposed legislation is summarized below. Actuarial costs pertain to changes in the 
actuarial present value of future benefit payments.  A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Savings are denoted by 
“Decrease” or a negative number. 
 
Actuarial Cost/(Savings) to Retirement Systems and OGB 	Decrease 
Total Five Year Fiscal Cost  
Expenditures 	Decrease 
Revenues 	Decrease 
 
Estimated Actuarial Impact: 
 
The chart below shows the estimated change in the actuarial present value of future benefit payments, if any, attributable to the 
proposed legislation.  A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. 
Present value costs associated with administration or other 	fiscal concerns are not included in these values. 
 
 	Change in the 
Actuarial Cost/(Savings) to: 	Actuarial Present Value 
All Louisiana Public Retirement Systems 	Decrease 
Other Post Retirement Benefits 	$0 
Total 	Decrease 
 
This bill complies with the Louisiana Constitution which requires unfunded liabilities created by an improvement in benefits to be 
amortized over a period not to exceed ten years. 
 
Estimated Fiscal Impact: 
 The chart below shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation.  This represents the effect on cash flows for 
government entities including the retirement systems and the Office of Group Benefits.  Fiscal costs include estimated administrative 
costs and costs associated with other fiscal concerns.  A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  F	iscal savings are 
denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. 
 
EXPENDITURES	2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-2018 2018-2019 5 Year Total
  State General Fund $                       0  Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease 
  Agy Self Generated                         0  Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease 
  Stat Deds/Other                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Federal Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Local Funds                          0  Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease 
  Annual Total $                       0  Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease 
REVENUES	2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-2018 2018-2019 5 Year Total
  State General Fund $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0 
  Agy Self Generated                         0  Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease 
  Stat Deds/Other                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Federal Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Local Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Annual Total $                       0  Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease 
  2014 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 43
 
 
Page 2 of 3 
Bill Information: 
 
Current Law 
 
Current law requires a specified portion of investment gains to be transferred from the Regular Benefit Account to the Experience 
Account.  However, current law does not permit a permanent benefit increase (PBI) to be granted without the completion of a 
significant legislative approval process that includes the introduction of a bill, passage by the House and Senate by a 2/3 vote, and 
a signature by the governor (see Actuarial Data, Methods, and Assumptions below).  If a PBI is granted, an amount equal to the 
actuarial present value of the PBI is transferred from the Experience Account back to the Regular Benefit Account to offset the 
additional liability incurred by the system.  Any amount in the Experience Account after this transaction remains in the 
Experience Account for potential later use. 
 
Proposed Law 
 
HB 43 provides that if a PBI is granted in accordance with the PBI formula and eligibility requirements already specified in 
current law, then any amount in the Experience Account remaining after such PBI grant shall be transferred back to the Regular 
Benefit Account and used to reduce the Original Amortization Base (OAB).  However, the schedule of amortization payments 
currently associated with the OAB will not be changed.  
 
Implications of the Proposed Changes 
 
Assets remaining in the Experience Account after a PBI is granted will be used to reduce the unf	unded account liability of the 
retirement system 
 
 
Cost Analysis: 
 
Analysis of Actuarial Costs 
 
Retirement Systems 
 
The PBI formula provides for a 1.5% permanent benefit increase.  If the legislature approves the PBI, then the balance in the 
Experience Account after the PBI is granted is estimated to be about $32.5 million. 
 
Balance in the Experience Account on July, 1, 2013 $  219,736,907 
Present Value Cost of a 1.5% Permanent Benefit Increase 187,254,192 
Remaining Balance in the Experience Account  	32,482,715 
 
HB 43 requires the $32.5 million amount to be transferred back to the Regular Benefit Account and used to reduce the 
outstanding balance of the OAB on June 30, 2014.  HB 43 also specifies that the OAB amortization payment schedule remain 
the same as it was before the balance was reduced.  As a result, interest payments on the 	OAB debt will be reduced by $99.2 
million. 
 
To more completely understand the consequences of the transaction required by HB 43	, it is important to know that HB 43 
reverses an earlier transaction.  A New UAL charge base, or debt, was established for the Regular Benefit Account when the 
$32.5 million amount was originally transferred to the Experience Account.  The New UAL debt was amortized over 30 
years with level payments equal to $	2.8 million a year.  HB 43 returns the $32.5 million to the Regular Benefit Account but 
instead of reducing the New UAL that had been created, it is used to reduce the Initial Unfunded Accrued Liability (the 
IUAL).  A summary of these transactions is given below. 
 
1. The state originally borrowed $219.7 million from the Regular Benefit Account and placed it in the Experience 
Account.  The state, through employer contributions, must pay back the Regular Benefit Account with equal 
payments over 30 year s. 
 
2. HB 43 provides that the residue after funding the 1.5% permanent benefit increase, $32.5 million, will be transferred 
back to the Regular Benefit Account. 
 
3. However, the $ 32.5 million will be applied not 	to the original debt 	(the New UAL), but rather to the Original 
Amortization Base (OAB, or the IUAL) which must be paid off by 2029. 
 
4. The end result is that $	32.5 million of the OAB debt, which 	originally was scheduled to be paid off over the next 15 
years (by 2029) in accordance with a constitutional mandate, will now be paid off over a longer period of time.   
 
5. $32.5 million has been removed from the OAB which must be paid off by 2029 and has 	become a new UAL which 
is amortized over 30 years. 
 
There is no guarantee that future PBI legislation will follow the eligibility criteria or formulas contained in current law that 
until now has been subject to a substantively automatic approval process.  Nor is there any guarantee, that PBIs in the future 
will even be based on the balance in the Experience Account.  However, as long as the Experience Account is in law, it is 
likely that the balance in the Experience Account will have some influence on the size of any PBI given.  It is also likely that 
enactment of HB 43 will delay and perhaps limit the size of the next PBI grant given by the legislature. 
 
Therefore, we conclude that the actuarial present value of future benefits will be reduced as a result of HB 43. 
  2014 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 43
 
 
Page 3 of 3 
 
Other Post Retirement Benefits 
 
There are no actuarial costs associated with HB 43 for post-employment benefits other than pensions. 
 
Analysis of Fiscal Costs
 
 
HB 43 will have the following effects on fiscal costs during the five year measurement period. 
 
Expenditures: 
 
1. Expenditures from the General Fund will decrease because the balance in the Experience Account has been reduced. 
 
2. Expenditures from TRSL (Agy Self-Generated) will decrease because the balance in the Experience Account has been 
reduced. 
 
3. Expenditures from the Local Funds will decrease because the balance in the Experience Account has been reduced. 
 
Revenues: 
 
• TRSL revenues (Agy Self-Generated) will decrease because the balance in the Experience Account has been reduced. 
 
 
Actuarial Data, Methods, and Assumptions 
 
This actuarial note was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and assumptions as disclosed in the most recent actuarial valuation 
report approved by PRSAC.  The actuary signing this note may or may not agree with or endorse these assumptions.  He is using 
this data, methods and assumptions to provide consistency with the actuary for the retirement systems who may 	also be providing 
testimony to the Senate and House retirement committees. 
 
Article (10)(29)(F) of the Louisiana Constitution was amended by the legislature and the voters in 2010.  This provision states 
“Benefit provisions for members of any public retirement system, plan, or fund that is subject to legislative authority shall be 
altered only by legislative enactment.  No such benefit provisions having an actuarial cost shall be enacted unless approved by 
two-thirds of the elected members of each house of the legislature.” Based on our reading of the amendment, our discussions 
with General Council for the LLA, and our discussions with legislative staff, we have concluded for the purposes of this actuarial 
note, that future transfers of investment gains to the Experience Account will occur until the balance in the Experience Account is 
equal to the cost of a 6% benefit increase for eligible retirees.  However, because future COLA grants will require the introduction 
of a bill, approval by two-thirds of the House and Senate, and the signature of the governor, we assume that COLA grants are ad 
hoc, and are not automatic 
 
 
Actuarial Caveat 
 
There is nothing in this bill that has or will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of actuarial 
opinion.  
 
 
Actuarial Credentials: 
 
Paul T. Richmond is the Manager of Actuarial Services for the Louisiana Legislative Auditor.  He is an Enrolled Actuary, a 
member of the American Academy of Actuaries, a member of the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of 
the American Academy of Actuaries necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. 
 
 
Dual Referral: 
 
Senate  	House 
 
 13.5.1: Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 6.8(F)(1): Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 
    
 13.5.2: Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000  6.8(F)(2): Annual State Revenue Reduction ≥ $100,000 
    
   6.8(G): Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000