Louisiana House Bill HB443

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Requires the secretary of state to compare the names of candidates with certain criminal history records and to inform the district attorney of his findings under certain circumstances

Impact

The implementation of HB 443 will directly modify the qualification process for candidates seeking public office in Louisiana. It aims to uphold the constitutional provisions that prevent individuals with past felony convictions from accessing public positions unless certain conditions are met. As such, the bill reinforces state laws designed to promote accountability in elections and protect the integrity of public office, potentially altering the landscape of candidate qualifications significantly. Furthermore, it enhances the powers and responsibilities of district attorneys regarding candidate vetting.

Summary

House Bill 443 aims to enhance the election integrity process in Louisiana by requiring the Secretary of State to compare candidates' names against criminal history records. If the Secretary of State finds potential disqualifying factors, such as felony convictions that have not been pardoned, they are mandated to inform the relevant district attorney. The bill stipulates that if grounds for disqualification are determined, the district attorney must initiate action to object to the candidate's candidacy. This measure aims to ensure that only eligible individuals qualify for elective office, aligning candidate eligibility with existing constitutional provisions regarding criminal convictions.

Sentiment

Sentiments regarding HB 443 seem to be mixed among legislators and stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for maintaining the integrity of elections, ensuring that candidates meet the requisite legal and ethical standards to serve in public office. Conversely, some critics may view it as overly restrictive or punitive, arguing that it could disenfranchise individuals seeking rehabilitation after their convictions, particularly if expungement opportunities are not adequately outlined within the supportive legal frameworks.

Contention

Debate around HB 443 primarily centers on the balance between ensuring public safety and fair access to electoral opportunities. A significant point of contention lies in the potential implications for individuals seeking candidacy who may have faced legal issues in the past. This raises questions about the fairness of disqualification based solely on past felonies, as many advocacy groups emphasize rehabilitation and reintegration into society. The bill's passage could lead to significant discussions about the broader ramifications of criminal justice reform in regards to voting rights and accessibility to public service.