Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB625 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

                            HLS 14RS-1449	ORIGINAL
Page 1 of 2
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
Regular Session, 2014
HOUSE BILL NO. 625
BY REPRESENTATIVE ABRAMSON
JUDGES:  Provides for the recusation of judges in certain civil matters
AN ACT1
To amend and reenact Code of Civil Procedure Article 151(C) and to enact Code of Civil2
Procedure Article 151(D), relative to the recusal of judges; to provide for the recusal3
of a family court judge in certain circumstances; and to provide for related matters.4
Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:5
Section 1. Code of Civil Procedure Article 151(C) is hereby amended and reenacted6
and Code of Civil Procedure Article 151(D) is enacted to read as follows: 7
Art. 151.  Grounds8
*          *          *9
C.  A judge of a family court shall be recused when he employs a hearing10
officer who has been employed or consulted as an attorney in the cause.11
D. In any cause in which the state, or a political subdivision thereof, or a12
religious body or corporation is interested, the fact that the judge is a citizen of the13
state or a resident of the political subdivision, or pays taxes thereto, or is a member14
of the religious body or corporation, is not a ground for recusation.15 HLS 14RS-1449	ORIGINAL
HB NO. 625
Page 2 of 2
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent.  [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
Abramson	HB No. 625
Abstract: Provides for the recusal of a family court judge who employs a hearing officer
who has been employed or consulted as an attorney in the cause.
Present law provides that a judge in a civil case shall be recused when he:
(1)Is a witness in the cause.
(2)Has been employed or consulted as an attorney in the cause or has previously been
associated with an attorney during the latter's employment in the cause, and the judge
participated in representation in the cause.
(3)Is the spouse of a party, or of an attorney employed in the cause or the judge's parent,
child, or immediate family member is a party or attorney employed in the cause.
(4)Is biased, prejudiced, or interested in the cause or its outcome or biased or prejudiced
toward or against the parties or the parties' attorneys or any witness to such an extent
that he would be unable to conduct fair and impartial proceedings.
Present law provides that a judge of a civil case may be recused when he:
(1)Has been associated with an attorney during the latter's employment in the cause.
(2)At the time of the hearing of any contested issue in the cause, has continued to
employ, to represent him personally, the attorney actually handling the cause (not
just a member of that attorney's firm).
(3)Has performed a judicial act in the cause in another court.
(4)Is related to: a party or the spouse of a party, within the fourth degree; an attorney
employed in the cause or the spouse of the attorney, within the second degree; or if
the judge's spouse, parent, child, or immediate family member living in the judge's
household has a substantial economic interest in the subject matter in controversy
sufficient to prevent the judge from conducting fair and impartial proceedings in the
cause.
Proposed law retains present law and provides for the recusal of a family court judge who
employs a hearing officer who has been employed or consulted as an attorney in the cause.
(Amends C.C.P. Art. 151(C); Adds C.C.P. Art. 151(D))