Requires owners or operators of certain water parks to provide safety information (OR SEE FISC NOTE SG RV)
The bill specifically impacts state laws regarding the construction and operation of water parks, particularly those using air-supported structures. It requires monthly water quality testing reports to be submitted to the DHH during operational periods and establishes procedures for reporting injuries sustained on such rides. This measure emphasizes public health and safety, ensuring that operators are held accountable for maintaining safe environments for guests.
House Bill 767, known as the Water Park Safety Law, establishes safety standards and compliance requirements for water parks that incorporate water-supported air structures. It mandates that any proposed construction or modification of these structures must receive prior approval from licensed architects or engineers and be vetted by the Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM) and the Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH). This regulatory oversight is designed to enhance public safety by ensuring that water parks adhere to established safety standards before any operations commence.
Overall sentiment regarding HB 767 is supportive, with stakeholders recognizing its necessity for enhancing safety protocols at amusement parks. Advocacy for public safety is at the forefront of discussions, indicating a strong consensus among legislators and safety advocates about the need for increased regulation in this area. However, there may be concerns from operators about the costs and bureaucratic hurdles associated with compliance, which can be viewed as a potential downside.
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the potential financial impact on water park operators due to stricter regulatory requirements and the burden of ongoing compliance costs. Critics argue that while safety is paramount, the implementation of these regulations could disproportionately affect smaller operators who may lack the resources to meet new standards. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for penalties and liability limitations, raising discussions about the balance between regulation and the operational livelihood of water parks.