Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB841

Introduced
3/10/14  
Introduced
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Engrossed
4/3/14  
Engrossed
4/3/14  
Refer
4/7/14  
Report Pass
5/14/14  
Report Pass
5/14/14  
Enrolled
5/21/14  
Enrolled
5/21/14  
Chaptered
5/28/14  
Chaptered
5/28/14  

Caption

Provides for voting trusts as holders of limited liability company certificates

Impact

The implications of HB 841 on state laws are significant as it establishes clearer guidelines regarding voting processes within limited liability companies. By allowing proxies, the bill recognizes the need for flexibility in management decision-making, enabling absent members to participate in vital Company voting matters. This amendment is anticipated to facilitate smoother operational dynamics within LLCs, promoting participation in governance by allowing members to authorize proxies to represent them, especially in circumstances where they cannot be present.

Summary

House Bill 841 aims to update the Louisiana statutes regarding limited liability companies (LLCs), specifically focusing on the definitions related to 'person,' the voting rights of managers, and the provisions for voting by proxy. This bill broadens the understanding of 'person' within the context of LLCs to include various forms of entities such as corporations and partnerships. It also proposes that members of an LLC may vote in person or through a duly authorized written proxy, ensuring that the voting rights are clearly defined and streamlined for governance structures within LLCs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive among lawmakers who see it as a necessary adaptation to modern business practices. The ability for LLC members to utilize proxies aligns with the needs of contemporary corporate governance structures, and many see this as a step forward for enhancing business efficiency. However, there could be concerns about the misuse of proxy voting, which may lead to complex power dynamics within LLCs if not properly regulated.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding how proxies are managed, potentially leading to disputes over their validity and the management of voting trust agreements. The bill stipulates the requirement for written authorization for proxies, but there may be concerns about ensuring this process is not easily exploitable. Transparency in the execution of proxy agreements is crucial, and some members may question the adequacy of provisions that limit the role of proxies to those explicitly authorized, fearing that such measures might restrict member participation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB999

Mobilehome park residencies: rent control: exemption: COVID-19.

CA AB1345

Residential Exclusive Listing Agreements Act.

CA AB1380

Premarital agreements: enforcement.

CA AB2517

Water: irrigation districts: long-term maintenance agreements.

WV SB453

Establishing uniform requirements for restrictive employment agreements

CA AB1023

Ronald Reagan Day: state holiday.

CA AB1972

Income share agreements: postsecondary training: gross income exclusion.

TX SB1052

Relating to certain retail installment contracts and leases for vehicles; providing for a civil penalty.