Requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the prescriptive periods established for disavowal of paternity and revocations of authentic acts of acknowledgment
Impact
This resolution is significant as it could lead to potential revisions in Louisiana's laws regarding paternity and child support. By encouraging a study of the prescriptive periods, the resolution opens the door for legislative recommendations that could adjust existing laws to better reflect current scientific understanding and societal norms related to paternity. If changes are recommended and implemented, it could lead to a more equitable legal framework for fathers who find themselves in unexpected paternity situations.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 179 (HCR179) urges the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the prescriptive periods for disavowal of paternity actions and revocations of authentic acts of acknowledgment. The resolution aims to address possible inequities faced by presumed fathers who, after the established time limits, learn they are not the biological father of a child yet are still obligated to provide child support. Given advancements in DNA testing, which now makes establishing biological paternity more accessible, the resolution is timely as discussions about parental rights and responsibilities continue to evolve.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR179 appears to be relatively supportive, as it seeks to remedy potential injustices faced by men in paternity disputes. The intent of the resolution highlights the legislature's concern for the best interests of children involved in these situations, while also acknowledging the changing landscape of family dynamics and scientific advancements in genetic testing. Overall, support for this resolution suggests a recognition of fairness in family law practices.
Contention
While HCR179 does not indicate any explicit opposition, it implies a need for careful consideration of the implications of changing paternity laws. Critics may argue that lengthening or changing the prescriptive periods could undermine the certainty and finality that established time limits provide, possibly opening the door for disputes that could disrupt the lives of children and families. Thus, discussions surrounding the findings of the Louisiana State Law Institute's study may reveal differing opinions on the balance between the rights of presumed fathers and the stability of child support obligations.
Requests the La. State Law Institute to study the potential impact of creating a child support calculation system in cases of "dual paternity" on other areas of law
Urges and requests the Louisiana State Law Institute to study and make recommendations concerning gun ownership rights of persons who have attempted suicide
Requests that the Bd. of Regents and the State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Education, with the Taylor Foundation, La. Office of Student Financial Assistance, public postsecondary education management boards, and certain others, study certain issues relative to TOPS
Requests the Louisiana Workforce Commission and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs to study employment practices and professional licensing requirements to benefit veterans in the workforce
Creates a task force to study meaningful oversight of the professional healthcare licensing boards statutorily created within the Department of Health and Hospitals.