Commends Susy Lemoine upon receiving the Women with Heart Award presented by the St. Landry-Evangeline United Way Women's Leadership Council
While House Resolution 20 primarily serves as a commendation without direct implications on state laws or policies, it fosters a culture of appreciation and recognition for community service. The acknowledgment of individuals like Lemoine is significant in promoting the value of civic engagement and volunteerism within the state. By honoring local leaders, the resolution encourages others in their communities to strive for similar levels of involvement and contributions, thus potentially enhancing communal ties and collaboration.
House Resolution 20 commends Susy Lemoine for her exemplary contributions to the community, highlighted by her receipt of the 2014 Women with Heart Award from the St. Landry-Evangeline United Way Women's Leadership Council. The resolution not only celebrates her achievements as an outreach coordinator and grant writer for the Evangeline Parish Library System but also acknowledges her broader impact as a dedicated community servant in Louisiana. Lemoine's recognition underscores the importance of contributions made by individuals in local communities across the state.
The overall sentiment surrounding HR20 is one of positive recognition and appreciation. Legislators and community members likely view the commemoration of Susy Lemoine as a positive step towards celebrating local heroes who make significant differences in their communities. There is a sense of unity and pride associated with such acknowledgments, which reflects well not only on the individual being recognized but also on the community and state that support these values.
There are minimal points of contention related to HR20, primarily because it is a resolution of commendation rather than a bill that impacts laws or policies. The nature of the resolution typically garners support and does not provoke significant debate, focusing instead on celebrating accomplishments. Any contention might arise from differing opinions about the recognition processes or debates over whose contributions deserve such accolades, but these aspects tend to be less prominent in discussions surrounding this type of legislation.