Directs each state agency to notify members of the House of Representatives no later than five days prior to any action by the agency which results in the termination of one hundred or more state employees or which results in a change of the parish in which one hundred or more state employees report to work
Impact
The resolution seeks to ensure that community leaders and representatives are informed about important employment changes that could affect local economies and social dynamics. This proactive notification process would allow local leaders to better assist constituents dealing with job loss or relocation, fostering a more responsive governmental framework when it comes to state employment issues. It highlights the legislative intent to bear in mind the community's position in personnel actions taken by state agencies.
Summary
House Resolution 207 (HR207) aims to enhance transparency and communication regarding major changes in state employment. Specifically, it mandates that state agencies must notify members of the House of Representatives at least five days prior to any action that would result in the termination of 100 or more state employees or the relocation of these employees to a different parish. This measure is prompted by concerns over the privatization of state jobs and the significant upheaval that such actions can cause within communities.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HR207 is generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step for accountability and community engagement in state agency actions. By requiring prior notification, the resolution aims to foster better communication between state agencies and local representatives. However, there may be some contention regarding the enforceability and practicality of such notifications, as not all agency decisions can easily align with a notification timeline.
Contention
The resolution may face challenges related to its implementation, particularly from state agencies concerned about compliance burdens and operational flexibility. Opponents might argue that mandating notifications could complicate decision-making processes within agencies and infringe on their ability to manage employment effectively without unnecessary delays. Nevertheless, the resolution's intent to safeguard employee welfare in the face of organizational changes is a vital discussion point within the legislative framework.
Provides that an action by a state agency which results in the termination of one hundred or more employees or a change in the parish in which one hundred or more employees report to work shall not be effective or enforcable unless it meets certain requirements
Amends the definition of "small employer" for purposes of the small employer health insurance availability act to mean a business employing less than one hundred (100) employees rather than fifty (50) employees.
Amends the definition of "small employer" for purposes of the small employer health insurance availability act to mean a business employing less than one hundred (100) employees rather than fifty (50) employees.