Provides relative to restitution of audit costs. (8/1/14) (EN INCREASE SG RV See Note)
Impact
The enactment of SB161 would significantly impact the procedures related to financial accountability within the state government. By empowering the legislative auditor and attorney general to pursue restitution, the bill reinforces the commitment to deterring fraud and financial misconduct within public operations. The implications of this bill extend to enhancing financial oversight and ensuring that those responsible for financial negligence or wrongdoing bear the costs associated with their actions. This can lead to improved accountability and possibly deter future misappropriation cases in state operations.
Summary
Senate Bill 161 introduces a framework for recovering costs incurred by the legislative auditor when conducting audits, investigations, or reporting on potential fraud, theft, or other forms of misappropriation. This bill posits that all associated costs are recoverable through civil suits against those deemed responsible for said misappropriation. If fraud or other misappropriation is established, the attorney general can seek recovery of these expenses on behalf of the legislative auditor, making provisions for the inclusion of reasonable attorney fees in such recoveries as well.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment surrounding SB161 appears to be supportive, highlighting a bipartisan acknowledgment of the necessity for stronger mechanisms to address issues of fraud and misappropriation of funds. Lawmakers expressed agreement on the importance of safeguarding public funds and ensuring that those who misappropriate resources are held accountable. This sentiment reflects a broader commitment to transparency and accountability within the state's fiscal governance, although no significant opposition or notable contention points were recorded in the available discussions or voting history.
Contention
While the discussions surrounding SB161 did not reveal substantial contention points or debates, the bill's provisions naturally draw attention to the balance of power between state agencies and the implications for local governance. The stipulation that the attorney general must assist in recovering costs can also raise questions about resource allocation and prioritization within the attorney general's office. As it stands, the bill is poised to enhance the authority of the legislative auditor without significant opposition, thereby streamlining the processes related to accountability for financial misconduct.
Provides relative to notification of the legislative auditor and district attorney of the misappropriation of certain public funds and restitution of audit costs. (8/1/14)
Requires reporting of misappropriation of public funds received or expended by a quasi-public entity to the legislative auditor and the district attorney. (8/1/20)