Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB309

Introduced
3/10/14  
Introduced
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Refer
3/10/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Engrossed
4/1/14  
Refer
4/2/14  
Refer
4/2/14  
Report Pass
5/14/14  
Report Pass
5/14/14  
Enrolled
5/29/14  
Enrolled
5/29/14  
Chaptered
6/4/14  
Chaptered
6/4/14  
Passed
6/4/14  

Caption

Provides for screening of pregnant women for HIV and syphilis in the third trimester of pregnancy. (gov sig)

Impact

If enacted, SB 309 would modify R.S. 40:1091 to ensure that pregnant women receive consistent health screenings for HIV and syphilis at critical stages of their pregnancy. The proposed law reinforces the physician's responsibility to offer these tests, fostering a health-conscious environment aimed at preventing the transmission of infections. The bill also seeks to ensure that proper procedures are followed, enhancing the likelihood of early diagnosis and subsequent interventions that could save lives and prevent complications associated with these diseases.

Summary

Senate Bill 309 aims to amend existing Louisiana law concerning the screening of pregnant women for HIV and syphilis. The legislation requires that any physician attending a pregnant woman must offer to take a blood sample in both the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and again during labor or delivery. The legislation seeks to facilitate early detection and treatment of these conditions to improve health outcomes for both mothers and their babies. The emphasis on third-trimester screening is intended to catch any infections that may not have been detected earlier in the pregnancy, thereby enhancing maternal and child health protections.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 309 appears to be positive, reflecting a broad consensus that increased testing for HIV and syphilis among pregnant women is a crucial public health strategy. Supporters argue that this legislation is a proactive measure that strengthens existing health protocols for pregnant women, thus providing a critical safeguard. However, detailed discussions on the legislation indicate that there may have been concerns about access, consent, and the implications of mandatory testing practices for healthcare providers.

Contention

While the bill overwhelmingly passed with a vote tally of 96 in favor and none against, potential points of contention include the logistics of implementing these testing requirements in varying healthcare facilities, especially in rural or underserved areas. There is also the challenge of balancing the requirements for testing with the need for informed consent from patients, which may lead to debates around patient autonomy in healthcare decision-making. Nevertheless, the clear directive of the bill is aimed at enhancing prenatal care and improving health outcomes for vulnerable populations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.