Louisiana Senate Bill SB369

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 3/24/14
• Engrossed: 3/26/14
• Refer: 3/27/14
• Report Pass: 4/29/14
• Enrolled: 5/21/14
• Chaptered: 5/30/14
• Passed: 5/30/14

Caption

Provides for the possession limits of crappie on Lake D'Arbonne. (8/1/14)

Impact

The passage of SB 369 directly impacts the existing regulations related to the possession of crappie, one of the popular sport fish species in Louisiana. Setting a standardized limit helps to manage the crappie population effectively, ensuring that the fishery remains sustainable over time. By allowing the department the authority to adjust these limits based on scientific data, the bill aligns state regulations with contemporary environmental management practices, thereby supporting healthy aquatic ecosystems.

Summary

Senate Bill 369, enacted in 2014, aims to amend Louisiana's fishing regulations specifically regarding the possession limits of crappie in certain water bodies, particularly Lake D'Arbonne. The bill sets a fifty fish possession limit for crappie caught in this lake and empowers the relevant department to amend this limit based on biological sampling data. This legislative change highlights the state's ongoing commitment to fisheries management and sustainable recreational fishing practices.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 369 appears to be positive, with unanimous support reflected in the voting history, where the bill passed with 38 votes in favor and none against. This broad consensus showcases an agreement among legislators on the importance of regulating fish populations for the benefit of recreational fishing and ecological integrity. Stakeholders and fishing enthusiasts likely view this legislation favorably, as it prioritizes responsible management of fishery resources.

Contention

While no significant points of contention were recorded in the discussions or voting for SB 369, it is essential to recognize that changes to fishing regulations can sometimes generate debate among different fishing communities. Modifications to possession limits can be sensitive, as they may influence local fishing practices and economic activities linked to recreational fishing. However, the amendment appears to have been designed with a proactive approach, emphasizing scientific data to mitigate potential conflicts.