Provides relative to Statewide Flood-Control Program. (8/1/14)
Impact
The proposed changes will help improve the efficiency of funding allocation for flood-control projects. By allowing smaller local governments to submit applications with more support from state agencies, the bill aims to ensure that municipalities of all sizes have the resources they need to tackle flood risks. Furthermore, the repeal of outdated provisions seeks to modernize the flood-control program, enabling authorities to focus on current needs and challenges in flood management. These amendments could lead to quicker responses to flooding crises and better preparedness through increased governmental collaboration.
Summary
Senate Bill 375, introduced by Senator Chabert, addresses amendments to the existing statewide flood-control program. The bill facilitates changes in how funding applications for flood-control projects are submitted and reviewed. It permits local municipalities and governing authorities to submit applications for financial assistance directly to the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) by a specified deadline. The provisions of this bill intend to streamline funding procedures and enhance the response capabilities for flood-related matters across the state.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 375 appears to be positive among supporters who see it as a necessary update to an existing framework that is now outdated. Legislators and stakeholders involved in flood management have expressed optimism about the potential for improved flood readiness and assistance. However, there may be concerns regarding the allocation of funding and whether all local municipalities will benefit equally from the program enhancements.
Contention
While the bill presents opportunities for improvement in the flood-control program, there could be points of contention related to the actual impact on funding distributions. Some critics may argue that the changes might disproportionately favor larger municipalities with greater resources and capacity for developing robust applications. Discussions around equitable access to these funds will be critical to address any potential disparities that could arise from the new legislative framework.
Provides for information of any negative and positive impact on surrounding parishes to be included in applications for funding of any flood-control projects. (8/1/15) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.