Louisiana Senate Bill SB521

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Provides relative to commercial surrogacy. (8/1/14)

Impact

The passage of SB 521 would significantly alter state laws surrounding surrogacy. Specifically, it would criminalize the financial inducement of women to act as surrogates, thereby reducing the potential for exploitation. The bill outlines that while intended parents may reimburse surrogates for legitimate medical expenses, any form of compensation related to the surrogacy agreement itself is forbidden. This change reflects a broader legislative intent to align the state’s laws with protective measures for surrogates and discourage the commercialization of reproductive services.

Summary

Senate Bill 521 addresses the regulatory landscape of commercial surrogacy in Louisiana, aiming to prohibit exploitative practices within this industry. By expressly deeming the actions of brokers that exploit financially vulnerable women as contrary to public policy, the bill seeks to safeguard the rights and welfare of surrogates. This proposal delineates the legal framework relating to both genetic and gestational surrogacy, offering clear definitions and stipulations regarding the responsibilities of all parties involved, particularly brokers and intended parents.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment surrounding SB 521 appeared to gather support, especially among advocates for women's rights and social justice. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step towards ensuring ethical practices within the surrogacy industry and protecting vulnerable populations from coercion. Conversely, some critics have expressed concerns that stringent regulations may limit options for families looking to use surrogacy as a means to build their families, indicating a complex societal dialogue around reproductive rights and financial equity.

Contention

Key points of contention reside in the balancing of regulation versus freedom of choice in reproductive agreements. While proponents emphasize the need to protect surrogates from exploitation, critics worry that overly restrictive laws might push surrogacy practices underground or create barriers for intending parents. The explicit ban on brokers and financial discussions in surrogacy arrangements could lead to conflicts regarding medical costs and ethical considerations in surrogate arrangements, creating a need for further discourse on the best pathways for supporting all parties involved.