Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB587

Introduced
3/31/14  
Introduced
3/31/14  
Refer
4/1/14  
Report Pass
4/7/14  
Report Pass
4/7/14  
Engrossed
4/14/14  
Engrossed
4/14/14  
Refer
4/15/14  
Refer
4/15/14  
Report Pass
5/7/14  
Report Pass
5/7/14  
Enrolled
5/30/14  
Enrolled
5/30/14  
Chaptered
6/19/14  
Passed
6/19/14  

Caption

Provides relative to the Mid-City Security District. (gov sig)

Impact

The bill introduces a flat fee structure based on property classifications within the district. For improved residential parcels, the fee ranges from $200 to $250 per year, while commercial parcels would be assessed up to $375. This fee mechanism is intended to provide a viable funding source for district services. The measures outlined in the bill are expected to solidify the district's financial sustainability while enhancing security measures aimed at benefiting the local community.

Summary

Senate Bill 587 establishes a governance structure for the Mid-City Security District in New Orleans, appointing a five-member board of commissioners. The appointments are designated for members of the Mid-City Neighborhood Organization, the Parkview Neighborhood Association, and local governmental representatives, ensuring that community involvement is central to the district's governance. Board members will serve three-year terms and are expected to manage the district's affairs in alignment with the needs of local residents.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 587 is largely positive, predominantly among proponents who view it as a necessary step to increase safety and improve the quality of life in Mid-City. Supporters appreciate the establishment of a local governance structure that promotes community engagement. However, there are some concerns regarding the potential financial burden that the annual fees might impose on residents and businesses, sparking debates about affordability and the effective allocation of collected funds.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the fine balance between ensuring adequate funding for security without overburdening residents. Some community voices suggest that while establishing a security district could enhance neighborhood safety, it should not detract from traditional funding sources or municipal responsibilities. Additionally, concerns about the longevity and renewability of the fees, particularly since they require community voting for renewal, has stirred discussions on sustained financial commitment from residents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

NH HB50

Apportioning state representative districts.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

MS HB1311

Seventh Circuit Court District; revise number of assistant district attorneys and criminal investigators.