Louisiana Senate Bill SB634

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/1/14
• Refer: 4/2/14

Caption

Provides relative to groundwater and surface water. (8/1/14) (OR SEE FISC NOTE)

Impact

The proposed measures within SB 634 mark a significant shift in how water resources are governed in Louisiana. By mandating that the commissioner of conservation set limits on groundwater withdrawals, the bill seeks to ensure the long-term viability of the state’s water supply. These restrictions are phased in, starting with limits on high-volume groundwater usage intended to protect this vital resource for future generations. The bill's language explicitly mandates that the legislature acts vigilantly to uphold the constitutional obligations concerning water conservation.

Summary

Senate Bill 634 establishes the Louisiana Water Code, aimed at creating a comprehensive legal framework for the management and use of Louisiana's water resources. This piece of legislation recognizes the significant public interest in regulating water usage, including both surface water and groundwater, and sets forth a directive for the formation of a Water Code Committee. This committee is tasked with developing detailed provisions regarding water resource management, conservation, and riparian rights, which are essential for the sustainable use of water in the state.

Sentiment

The reception of SB 634 appears to be largely positive among environmental advocates and legislators focusing on sustainable practices, as it is seen as a proactive approach to water management. However, potential concerns may arise regarding the impact of strict groundwater usage limits on industries that rely heavily on these resources, as stakeholders in agriculture or large-scale production may perceive restrictions as hindering their operational capacities. Overall, the sentiment reflects a commitment to environmental stewardship balanced with economic considerations.

Contention

While the bill emphasizes the need for comprehensive regulation to secure water resources, notable points of contention may emerge from those who feel that the restrictions could adversely affect agricultural operations and community access to water. Additionally, discussions around the specific makeup of the Water Code Committee have stirred debates about who should be included in these important decisions, particularly whether adequate representation of local interests will be guaranteed.