Provides for driver's licenses and special identification cards not compliant with REAL ID Act of 2005. (8/1/14)
The bill is expected to have significant implications for state identification protocols by shifting regulations around the issuance of driver's licenses and special identification cards. By allowing for non-REAL ID compliant options, SB640 presents a change in the state's approach to identity verification. If approved, individuals could retain accessibility to state services and travel without the stringent requirements of the federal REAL ID guidelines, thus impacting how residents engage with state agencies and transportation sectors, particularly air travel.
Senate Bill 640 aims to allow Louisiana residents to obtain driver's licenses and special identification cards that do not comply with the REAL ID Act of 2005. The bill specifies that the Office of Motor Vehicles (OMV) shall issue these licenses and identification cards without requiring applicants to meet certain REAL ID requirements that were not mandated by the state as of January 1, 2014. This action is intended to provide residents with an alternative identification option, particularly for those who may not have the required documentation for REAL ID compliance. If enacted, the bill would take effect on August 1, 2014.
The sentiment surrounding SB640 appears to be mixed, with supporters appreciating the flexibility it provides to those who may struggle to meet the rules set by the REAL ID Act. Advocates argue that the bill promotes inclusiveness by recognizing the varying levels of documentation among residents. Conversely, there may be concern from government officials and security advocates about the potential risks associated with less stringent identification measures, suggesting a possible debate over state compliance with federal standards.
Notable points of contention include concerns from some legislators and organizations regarding the implications of granting identification that does not comply with national standards. Critics argue that the bill could undermine the security measures intended to be reinforced by the REAL ID Act, potentially complicating matters of national security and lawful entry into federal facilities. This contention reflects a broader dialogue on the balance between accessibility for residents and adherence to federally mandated security guidelines, which may pose challenges for implementation.