Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB129

Introduced
3/20/15  
Refer
3/20/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Refer
5/7/15  
Refer
5/7/15  
Report Pass
5/25/15  
Report Pass
5/25/15  
Enrolled
5/28/15  
Enrolled
5/28/15  
Chaptered
6/19/15  
Passed
6/19/15  

Caption

Provides relative to nonresident tuition and fees for certain public institutions of higher education (EN SEE FISC NOTE SG RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 129 would create a more inclusive financial policy aimed at attracting nonresident students to Louisiana's HBCUs. By allowing these institutions to set their nonresident tuition rates, it aligns with broader efforts to improve operational efficiencies and accountability within the education system. This change is anticipated to foster greater enrollment and diversify the student body, thus benefiting the educational environment and potentially the state’s economy as these institutions grow in prominence.

Summary

House Bill 129 aims to amend the Louisiana Revised Statutes to authorize the management boards of historically black public colleges and universities (HBCUs) to reduce nonresident tuition and fees for undergraduate students. This bill emphasizes a more flexible approach to tuition rates for nonresident students enrolling in these institutions. By potentially lowering tuition costs for out-of-state students, the bill seeks to enhance enrollment opportunities and financial accessibility for prospective students from outside Louisiana.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 129 appears to be positive, particularly from supporters who view it as a necessary step to enhance the competitiveness of Louisiana's HBCUs. Advocates argue that reducing financial barriers for nonresidents can significantly benefit these schools and contribute to their sustainability. However, the discourse may include some apprehensions regarding how these changes will balance state tuition consistency and accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from discussions around the potential implications this bill has on funding and resources for state education. Critics might argue that allowing reduced tuition for nonresident students could lead to budgetary strains in public funding for education and raise concerns about equity and fairness in tuition rates across different institutions. Thus, the implementation of such policy changes requires careful consideration of both their short-term impacts and long-term sustainability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.

CA AB1341

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA SB1433

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB2341

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: out-of-state public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1160

Protecting Students from Creditor Colleges Act.