Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB155

Introduced
3/25/15  
Introduced
3/25/15  
Refer
3/25/15  
Refer
3/25/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/22/15  
Report Pass
4/22/15  
Engrossed
4/30/15  
Engrossed
4/30/15  
Refer
5/4/15  
Refer
5/4/15  
Report Pass
5/18/15  
Report Pass
5/18/15  
Enrolled
5/26/15  
Enrolled
5/26/15  
Chaptered
6/5/15  

Caption

Authorizes the transfer of certain state property in Calcasieu Parish

Impact

The implications of HB 155 involve a significant change in how land transactions are handled by the state administration. By facilitating the transfer of these properties, the bill aims to promote more effective management of state resources and potentially benefit local economies through increased accessibility to land for private individuals. However, the bill does not provide explicit details on how these transfers might be utilized in future developments, which could leave some uncertainty regarding long-term outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 155, introduced by Representative Danahay, focuses on the transfer of specific state-owned properties located in Calcasieu Parish. The bill provides authorization for the commissioner of administration to convey, transfer, assign, lease, or deliver the state's interest in various parcels of property around the Hewitt Sub Tract area. Notably, mineral rights are excluded from this transfer, indicating a focus on surface property and its usage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive, primarily from those interested in property development or local governance in Calcasieu Parish. Legislative discussions suggest an acknowledgment of the need to streamline property transactions to enhance economic activity. However, without extensive public hearings or community engagement, there may be underlying concerns about the transparency and implications of such transfers on local governance and land management.

Contention

While HB 155 seeks to expedite property transfers, it also raises questions about the oversight of state resources. Critics may argue that such legislation could lead to hasty decisions regarding state-owned lands, particularly the absence of mineral rights in conveyances, which could affect future state revenues from these assets. Additionally, potential conflicts over land use may emerge if the community feels inadequately informed or consulted about the transactions outlined in the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.