Prohibits the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education from authorizing charter schools under certain circumstances
Impact
The proposed legislation is set to significantly alter the landscape of charter school approvals in Louisiana. By limiting BESE's authority to approve charters based on the performance of the local school system, the bill aims to prevent what some see as unnecessary competition that could siphon funds and students from established schools. The bill allows for exceptions, specifically for schools that aim to convert underperforming 'F' grade schools or those designed to serve students with exceptionalities, which indicates an effort to balance charter growth with the need to support struggling educational institutions.
Summary
House Bill 21, introduced by Representative Edwards, seeks to amend the regulations surrounding charter schools in Louisiana. The bill specifically prohibits the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) from authorizing the establishment of charter schools in school systems that have received an 'A' or 'B' designation under the school accountability system, provided that the local school board previously denied or placed conditions on a similar proposal. The intention of the bill is to ensure that charter schools do not proliferate in areas already demonstrating strong academic performance, thus funneling resources towards public education rather than expansion of charter schools in successful districts.
Sentiment
The reception around HB 21 appears mixed. Advocates for the bill argue that it is a necessary step to protect students and maintain high standards in already successful school districts. They believe that charter schools can undermine local school boards' efforts to provide quality education in their communities. Conversely, opponents express concern that this bill stifles educational choice and innovation, particularly in areas where local school boards may be resistant to change. Their argument centers on the idea that charter schools can provide alternative educational pathways that benefit students, particularly in underprivileged areas.
Contention
Key points of contention regarding HB 21 involve the balance of power between local school boards and the state education authority. Supporters maintain that local school boards, when rejecting charters, are acting in the best interest of their communities and students. In contrast, critics worry that such a law could hamstring the ability of families to choose alternative educational options, even in cases where existing schools may fail to meet the diverse needs of the student population. Thus, the bill raises critical discussions about educational equity, governance, and the role of state oversight versus local autonomy in education.
Prohibits the State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) from authorizing certain types of charter schools under certain fiscal circumstances
Requires certain charter school information to be submitted by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and ceases authorization of charter schools pending certification of such information
Provides for considerations of chartering authorities in reviewing charter proposals and of the State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Education in entering into proposed charters, reviewing proposed charter authorizers, and recruiting chartering groups
Requires the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and local public school boards to send certain information relative to independent evaluations of charter proposals to charter applicants
Provides relative to certain prohibited conflicts for members of the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and the superintendent of education
Authorizes initial proposals for charter schools with corporate partners to be made to the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education as Type 2 charter school proposals (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)
Provides relative to certain prohibited conflicts for members of the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and the state superintendent of education (EG SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)
Provides relative to notification provided by the State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Education to charter applicants upon the denial of charter proposals