Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB321

Introduced
4/1/15  
Introduced
4/1/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/18/15  
Report Pass
5/18/15  
Engrossed
5/26/15  
Engrossed
5/26/15  
Refer
5/27/15  
Refer
5/27/15  
Report Pass
6/2/15  
Report Pass
6/2/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Passed
6/29/15  

Caption

Provides relative to the La. Egg Commission

Impact

By amending the existing laws regulating the Louisiana Egg Commission, HB 321 can potentially lead to more efficient operations within the commission. With fewer members, it may simplify the process for decision-making and enhance the ability to address the immediate needs of the egg farming sector. The proposed meeting requirements also allow for greater flexibility, as the commission will now be able to convene quarterly and at the call of the chairman or the request of any three members. This could lead to more responsive governance in an industry that is quite dynamic.

Summary

House Bill 321 pertains to amendments concerning the Louisiana Egg Commission, focusing on the structure and operational protocols of the commission. The bill proposes a reduction in the membership from nine members to seven, which includes two active distributors instead of four. This change aims to streamline the commission's governance and its decision-making processes, allowing for more effective management and oversight of the egg production industry in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 321 appears to be generally positive, particularly among stakeholders in the egg production community who see the changes as beneficial for facilitating smoother operations. However, the sentiments might vary among various interest groups involved with agricultural commissions, as some may express concerns regarding representation and the implications of reducing member numbers.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 321 may arise from the decision to decrease the membership of the commission, as reducing the number of members could lead to concerns about adequate representation of various stakeholders in the egg industry. Moreover, the alteration in the makeup of the commission could spark debates regarding the influence of active distributors vs. other types of representatives in shaping policies that impact all egg producers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.